Deaf people can get interpreters, and businesses don’t have to be sued

Letter to Mayor of Miami-Dade County

It’s a common story. I’m on an assignment, and my deaf consumer mentions in passing how he went to the doctor the other day. Out of curiosity I ask: “Did she provide an interpreter for you?” I already know the answer: “No.” The fact is, despite the passage of the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) of 1990, which requires places of business to provide accommodations for people with disabilities, deaf and hard of hearing people go without their accommodations (one of which is sign language interpreters), not only at doctor’s offices, but also lawyer’s offices, meetings with real estate agents, at job interviews, at public events, and so on.

Sure, it’s easy for interpreters and other hearing people to tell deaf people: “But it’s your right! You could sue!” But they’re not the deaf person who has a million other things going on in their life, which may include finding a job and feeding a family, and who, moreover, may be thinking, “What kind of relationship will I have with my doctor/prospective employer/etc. if I threaten to sue them, even if it is to demand my basic right?”

Thankfully, some deaf and hard of hearing people have stood up to fight. Bringing lawsuits and ADA complaints against places of business definitely works, but here we are, 12 years later, and people still struggle to get their accommodation. This is what led me to think: There must be a better way. There must be a way for businesses to happily provide an interpreter when one is requested, which is conducive to also having a good relationship with their deaf and hard of hearing consumers.

Like many other states,  the Florida Legislature passed the Telecommunications Access System Act in 1991 to provide telecommunications services for people who are deaf and hard of hearing. This service is funded by a monthly surcharge billed to all telephone customers in the state. Thanks to this service, deaf people can conduct business over the phone, call family members, and make an emergency call when needed, just as a person who can hear does. This is the spirit of the ADA: to provide people with disabilities equal access.

While a solution has been implemented for equal access to telecommunications services, however, a gap has been left when it comes to equal access to community services.

My proposed solution is a surcharge added to the Local Business Tax Receipt (a.k.a. the county business license), or a similar vehicle, which will be used to fund the provision of sign language interpreters for community services. To my knowledge, no such service of this kind exists anywhere in the country, yet to every deaf person I come across and express the idea, the thought of hassle-free, equal access in the community excites them.

Here are some of the benefits:

  • Interpreter agencies do not go out of business. The county fund is simply a way to pay for services; therefore, there is likely to be more business. The county may also hire freelance interpreters directly.
  • Because there is a fund, there is also a way to get Deaf Interpreters on assignments when needed, instead of also having to fight for this.
  • The fund could also be used for other types of accommodation, such as CART services.
  • The fund may also be used, perhaps, to pay for training for hearing and deaf interpreters, to meet the demand.
  • Government services, such as county hospitals, the Social Security Administration, etc., do not purchase business licenses, and therefore would follow their usual process for providing interpreters.
  • Because anyone who purchases a business license would be contributing to the fund, then any place of business would be entitled to an interpreter for their consumers, even if they have fewer than 5 employees, or otherwise do not fall under ADA jurisdiction. (A lawyer might have to confirm this.)
  • Also because there is a fund for interpreting services which businesses contribute to, businesses would not have to worry about the extra expense of providing interpreters to interview and train prospective deaf or hard of hearing employees, which opens up job opportunities for them. Note: there may have to be a cap on the number of hours per year that an interpreter is provided for training, meetings, etc. for deaf employees, before the place of business has to take over the cost.

I’m sure I’m too blinded by the benefits of this type of service model that I do not see clearly the negatives, besides the obvious surcharge to businesses. I think businesses, however, would rather pay a small fee and be covered whenever an interpreter is needed, than to be sued down the road. Regardless, whatever negatives there are, they should be resolved in order to keep the overarching two-pronged principle of this idea: (1) for deaf and hard of hearing people to no longer have to fight for a basic right, and (2) for places of business not to be burdened by unexpected expenses.

Please feel free to share and comment on this idea. I’m attaching a letter that I wrote to the Mayor of Miami-Dade County proposing this very idea, but which never received a response.

Letter to Mayor of Miami-Dade County
Letter to Mayor of Miami-Dade County

5 thoughts on “Deaf people can get interpreters, and businesses don’t have to be sued

  1. My question is this, for the telephone it is a monthly fee on your phone bill correct? With a business license isn’t it a yearly thing instead so wouldn’t it either have to be a pretty high tax or not be enough to cover all the costs? Just thinking out loud.

    Like

  2. To be honest, I don’t know exactly what the cost would be on each annual license. The simple formula is take the estimated annual cost for interpreting services in the county and divide that by the number of businesses. In a place like Hardee County, Florida, the cost would be almost nothing because of the low incidence. In a place like Miami, the incidence is high, but there are hundreds of thousands of businesses to offset the cost. There is definitely some number crunching involved.

    Like

    1. Ah, now I understand the idea you are envisioning. It sounds like a wonderful idea. The question is… how will you convince the whole nation, including the government, the entire business industry ranging from restaurant to corporate building, to take on your idea? How will you gather up and create an entire community of interpreters from east coast to west coast and have them be ready for this change?

      Like

      1. The best way to get any big project done is by breaking it into smaller pieces. That’s why I suggested the county level; that way the service can meet the local needs of the community. Not all of the United States is the same, and different places have different needs. The underlying principle, however, should be the same: people shouldn’t have to sue to obtain their accommodations, and places of business should have an affordable way of providing the accommodation.

        Like

      2. Thought-provoking analysis – I loved the info . Does anyone know where my company might be able to get a blank FL Local Business Tax Receipt Application Form – Miami-Dade County copy to fill out ?

        Like

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s